Israel Made the Attack on the Saudi Oil Fields
Special Opinion Piece
Source: Bob Moriarty (9/16/19)
Bob Moriarty posits his theories on the attack on Saudi oil refinery.
As any fan of detective books or shows knows well, when you observe a crime you must first ask yourself, "Who benefits?" The Latin is Cui Bono? Literally to whom is it a benefit?
On Saturday September 14th someone fired missiles or sent armed drones against Saudi oil facilities reducing world oil production by 5% and Saudi production by 50%. The beleaguered Houthis group at war by Saudi Arabia in Yemen quickly claimed credit for the attack.
While the Houthis have used armed drones in attack mode previously against the Saudi's, those flights were bee stings compared to the sophistication and breath of success in the latest attack.
The BBC calls the latest events "a different order of magnitude altogether." There were seventeen different points of impact on the Abqaiq facility. What ragtag poorly armed enemy could possibly conduct such as remarkably complex attack?
Since the recent long past sell-by date demise of John Bolton, Donald Trump's current attack Chihuahua, Mike Pompeo, promptly insisted Iran was behind the attack.
But how does Iran benefit by starting World War III? Are they so fucking stupid that they would wave a red flag in front of the nuclear armed U.S., nuclear armed Israel and Saudi Arabia run by a snowflake who thinks cold blooded murder is just about right when his feelings are hurt.
Israel has been threatening Iran with destruction since at least 1982 with the publication of the Yinon Plan. The document is remarkable in its candor for the Zionist plan for the destruction of the Middle East. "Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation would prove to be advantageous to Israel at least in the short term," Yinon suggested.
Anyone believing the latest false flag operation of Israel is not designed to stir up conflict in the Middle East between Arab neighbors either cannot read or cannot think. This threat has been in print for the world to read for thirty-seven years.
For those who didn't get it at first glance, the mostly dual national Neocons wrote a position paper for Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 by Richard Perle called the "Clean Break."
The coldblooded nature of the document can only be appreciated in hindsight by recalling recent historical events causing the deaths of millions of innocents and the largest refugee problem since the end of WW II by the evil actions of Israel advocating for a state of constant conflict.
"Rather than pursuing a 'comprehensive peace' with the entire Arab world, Israel should work jointly with Jordan and Turkey to "contain, destabilize, and roll-back" those entities that are threats to all three."
Israel managed to con the U.S. into expending the blood of their children and gold from their treasury for the best part of nineteen years conducting a "roll-back." All for the benefit of Israel.
Not yet satisfied with the cold-blooded nature of their plans, the Neocons issued another position paper prior to the events of 911 they called "Rebuilding America's Defenses."
By this time the same mostly dual national Zionists called their conservative think tank, The Project for the New American Century. If anyone realized that the organization probably should have come under Truth in Advertising laws, the think tank would have more accurately been referred to as The Project for the New Israeli Century because it had nothing to do with America and everything to do with Israel.
In yet another remarkably blood drenched comment, the author stated, "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
Remember the attack on Pearl Harbor in December of 1941? That was the surprise attack on the Naval Base in Hawaii that was no surprise at all and resulted in the deaths of almost 3,000 American servicemen and dragged the US into World War II.
So would it be accurate to suggest that 911 was the "catastrophic and catalyzing event" the PNIC group so desperately desired to take place?
After all, at the very least Israel knew all about it. They sent a team of Mossad spies "to document the event." Again, almost 3,000 Americans died as a series of military adventures began that would bankrupt the US and cause the deaths of millions in the Middle East.
But in my three score and thirteen years I have learned that the simplest answer is almost certainly the most accurate answer. Israel does not need to convince the U.S. to destroy Iran on their behalf. The U.S. has been in an undeclared state of war against Iran for decades. All for the benefit of Israel.
There is a better and less complex answer. That has to do with an election on September 17th, 2019. If Benjamin Netanyahu wins another term in office he can stay out of jail for corruption a little longer.
Would Netanyahu stoop to front running an election by ordering the IDF to conduct a missile/drone attack on his good friends in Saudi Arabia that could easily ignite Armageddon?
Sure. Why not? It's Americans and Iranians who would die. He doesn't give a rat's ass about them. Especially if it keeps him out of jail a little longer.
Actually pulling the pin on nuclear hand grenades would be especially stupid. But he doesn't care.
Bob Moriarty
President: 321gold
President: 321gold
Bob and Barb Moriarty brought 321gold.com to the Internet almost 16 years ago. They later added 321energy.com to cover oil, natural gas, gasoline, coal, solar, wind and nuclear energy. Both sites feature articles, editorial opinions, pricing figures and updates on current events affecting both sectors. Previously, Moriarty was a Marine F-4B and O-1 pilot with more than 832 missions in Vietnam. He holds 14 international aviation records.
