Rina Castelnuovo for The New York Times
By ISABEL KERSHNER
Published: September 14, 2011
KALANDIA, West Bank — It is far from clear what will happen when the Palestinians go to the United Nations next week to seek recognition of statehood. But the initiative is engaging a Palestinian public that had become deeply cynical after 20 years of intermittent Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.
Multimedia
Related
-
Palestinians Pressured to Seek General Assembly Vote on Statehood (September 14, 2011)
-
U.S. Scrambles to Avert Palestinian Vote at U.N. (September 14, 2011)
Times Topic: Middle East Peace Talks
Related in Opinion
-
Editorial: Israel and New York’s Ninth District (September 15, 2011)
Room For Debate
Can Israel Survive Without a Palestinian State?
Abbas and Netanyahu are at a stalemate on the statehood issue. Wouldn't Israel be better off with a viable Palestine?
“Abu Mazen is doing a good thing, but the reactions could be bad,” said Khairiyya Abd al-Rahman, 66, a matronly resident of the refugee camp, using the popular name of the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas.
Going to the United Nations remains a high-stakes gambit for Mr. Abbas. Whether it succeeds or fails, the Palestinians’ frustration is likely to increase if their reality does not change. And while many Palestinians say they do not foresee the eruption of a third uprising, they warn that something is bound to give eventually if there is no measurable progress.
“Of course frustration can turn to chaos,” said Najeh Abd al-Majid, another resident of the camp, a frequent point of clashes between Palestinian youths and the Israeli military.
When the annual United Nations gathering begins on Monday, the Palestinian leadership could take its statehood bid to the Security Council, where the United States has vowed to use its veto, or it could opt for a vote in the General Assembly, a more modest route that would upgrade the Palestinian representation to that of a nonmember observer state, comparable to the Holy See.
Israel and the United States have tried to stop the showdown altogether, warning of dire consequences and insisting that the only way to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is through direct negotiations. Israel has not spelled out the possible fallout of a vote, but some on the right have called for the suspension of the transfer of tax revenues to the Palestinian Authority, the cancellation of agreements and the annexation of territory containing Jewish settlement blocs in the West Bank. There has been talk in Washington of cutting financing as well.
Yet the Palestinian public’s mood is strongly in favor of the United Nations bid, whatever the risks.
“We have to do it,” said Selwa Yassin, 51, from the village of Ein Yabrud in the Ramallah district.
“The consequences,” Ms. Yassin said, “cannot be worse than losing all of Palestine.”
For now, the Palestinian leadership is trying to foster a festive atmosphere. CONTINUED
No comments:
Post a Comment