One Stop shop for Daily Digest - News, Views and analysis of the political developments of the Horn of Africa. Now you can follow by email alerts situated at the bottom. Please feel free to forward any item of interest - it is your blog too (Make it your Home Page)
Friday, 3 June 2016
ICC rejects Ruto's application to have its staff prosecuted
While making the decision, three judges, Chile Eboe-Osuji, Olga Herrera Carbucchia and Robert Fremr, declared Ruto’s application as ‘moot’. They also believe that Ruto’s lawyer, Karim Khan, had gone personal by seeking to have ICC staff probed.
“The chamber notes the evident acrimony that permeated the parties’ submissions. As the record of the trial proceedings in the prosecutor v Ruto and Sang case shows, this chamber has consistently discouraged such attitude on the part of counsel appearing before it. The chamber thus reminds counsel that the dictates of professional responsibility require counsel to maintain detachment at all times from the case they are litigating,” the judges made the decision as quoted by Standard.
According to the court, DP Ruto would have succeeded had he made the appeal just before the April 5, 2016, ruling which saw his case end at the court. They said the proper forum for the applicants to bring their complaint would be the Pre-Trial Division.
The judges said that ‘the decision of April 5, 2016, was made final as it was not appealed by any of the parties’.
“The chamber recalls the wisdom of the maxim that litigation must come to a conclusion at some point. That point was when the period of appeal elapsed without an appeal,” they said.
DP Ruto’s legal team believes that a number of staff at the ICC and witnesses had colluded to ensure their cases drag on, and had applied to push Bensouda to order an independent investigation into misconduct of ICC staff, intermediaries and witnesses.
Among the crimes the ICC staff is accused of include bribing witnesses to testify falsely and having sex with witnesses.